The Contracting Education Academy

Contracting Academy Logo
  • Home
  • Training & Education
  • Services
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for Government Contracting News

December 18, 2009 By AMK

Senators push for acquisition workforce training

Senators leading government contracting reforms introduced two bills on Dec. 17 to bolster the overstressed federal acquisition workforce.

The Acquisition Workforce Improvement Act (S. 2901) would create a federal acquisition management fellows program to help mentor a new generation of acquisition workers with a governmentwide perspective and experience. It would combine both a master’s degree-level academic curriculum with on-the-job training. Students would go through rotational assignments at three or more agencies.

Procurement officials have advocated for shifting acquisition employees to various agencies to get a greater understanding of government procurement.

Under the bill, students would learn about upfront acquisition planning, cost-estimations and writing contracts. They would also learn about handling post-award administration of “high-risk” contract types, such as sole-source contracts and interagency contracts, said Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), ranking member of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. Collins introduced both bills with support from Sens. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) and Bob Bennett (R-Utah), the chairwoman and ranking member of the committee’s Contracting Oversight Subcommittee.

“With the increases we’ve seen in government contracting, it is unacceptable that our acquisition workforce is falling behind in terms of training and resources they need to effectively oversee spending,” McCaskill said.

The bill would also require participants to work in government for a certain amount of time after their schooling.

The second bill, the Federal Acquisition Institute Improvement Act (S. 2902), would prompt reorganization of the Federal Acquisition Institute (FAI), which works on career development and training the civilian acquisition workforce. Collins said FAI gets much less support than the Defense Department’s Defense Acquisition University, which leaves it underutilized. The bill would require the Office of Federal Procurement Policy to report annually to Congress on FAI funding needs.

Experts agree that the federal acquisition system is under tremendous stress. Despite dramatic increases in spending and little increase in the workforce’s size, contracting officers, the major component of the acquisition workforce, are feeling pressure both from the workload as well as other agency employees who push for fast procurements.

At a congressional hearing Dec. 16, Maureen Regan, counselor to the Veterans Affairs Department’s inspector general, said the department’s contracting officers are being pressured to award contracts, even though they—as the government’s buyers—believe the purchase isn’t in the government’s best interest.

Officials across the government believe the workforce is the key to fixing government contracting. They say the government needs procurement employees who understand the details of the Federal Acquisition Regulation as well as other aspects, such as negotiations and procurement strategies.

“Responsible federal contracting relies on careful, informed analysis by all components of the acquisition workforce,” Bennett said.

 — by Matthew Weigelt – Dec. 18, 2009 – Federal Computer Week

Filed Under: Government Contracting News Tagged With: acquisition training, acquisition workforce, procurement reform

June 24, 2009 By AMK

Agencies turn to GSA Schedules for T&M contracts

The vast majority of commercial services purchased on time-and-materials contracts went through the General Services Administration’s Multiple Award Schedules program, according to a report issued today. But it also said regulations showing that a T&M contract was the only option have not been applied to the program.

Agencies bought $9.1 billion worth of services on T&M contracts from February 2007 to December 2008, the Government Accountability Office said in the report. However, contracting officers could circumvent a Federal Acquisition Regulation’s rule requiring more details on why the officer wasn’t using a type of contract with less risk than a T&M contract.

Under T&M contracts, companies are paid for their time and their materials. The contract type is very risky for the government because costs can grow significantly in a short amount of time.

In 2007, the FAR was revised to allow agencies to use T&M contracts to buy commercial services using a streamlined procurement process. There were safeguards though. One of them required contracting officers to write a detailed determination and findings report to proving why no other contract type was suitable for the purchase.

GSA officials told GAO that the GSA administrator can decide what procedures apply to the program. The program is unique from usual contracts, and legislative language is unclear as to whether the rule requiring contracting officers to justify their decisions to use a T&M contract applies to the Schedules. In a legal opinion, GSA said the Schedules program has other safeguards requiring contracting officers to check that prices are reasonable.

GAO wasn’t convinced though. “It is not apparent to us that the regulations cited by GSA provide the government with risk mitigation equivalent to that provided by” the FAR requirement, it wrote.

However GSA officials said they were working to develop a similar rule that requires contracting officers to show why the T&M contract was the only option.

GAO recommends that regulators amend the regulation to make it clear that the FAR’s safeguard applies to the Schedules program.

— by Matthew Weigelt – June 24, 2009 – Federal Computer Week

Filed Under: Government Contracting News Tagged With: GAO, GSA, GSA Schedules, time and material

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 539
  • 540
  • 541

Popular Topics

abuse acquisition reform acquisition strategy acquisition training acquisition workforce Air Force Army AT&L bid protest budget budget cuts competition cybersecurity DAU DFARS DHS DoD DOJ FAR fraud GAO Georgia Tech GSA GSA Schedule GSA Schedules IG industrial base information technology innovation IT Justice Dept. Navy NDAA OFPP OMB OTA Pentagon procurement reform protest SBA sequestration small business spending technology VA
Contracting Academy Logo
75 Fifth Street, NW, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30308
info@ContractingAcademy.gatech.edu
Phone: 404-894-6109
Fax: 404-410-6885

RSS Twitter

Search this Website

Copyright © 2022 · Georgia Tech - Enterprise Innovation Institute