The Contracting Education Academy

Contracting Academy Logo
  • Home
  • Training & Education
  • Services
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for fixed price incentive

March 1, 2021 By cs

GAO: DoD has increased use of fixed-price-incentive contracts but should assess contributions to outcomes

Department of Defense guidance encourages the use of fixed-price-incentive (FPI) contracts to acquire major weapon systems, where appropriate.

These contracts can provide contractors with incentives to keep costs in check and stay on schedule.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) found that the DoD’s use of these contracts has increased since 2010; they accounted for about half of all DoD obligations for its major weapon systems in 2019. But the DoD has not assessed whether using these contracts has actually kept costs and schedules in line.

GAO recommended that the DoD assess its use of these contracts.

Over the 10-year period from fiscal years 2010 through 2019, obligations on FPI contracts for major defense acquisition programs (MDAPs) grew to account for almost half of the $65 billion in obligations for fiscal year 2019.

Keep reading this article at: https://www.hstoday.us/federal-pages/government-reports-and-summaries/dod-has-increased-their-use-but-should-assess-contributions-to-outcomes/

See GAO’s full report on this topic at: https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-21-181

Filed Under: Government Contracting News Tagged With: DoD, fixed price, fixed price incentive, FPI, GAO, major programs, MDAP, schedule

August 21, 2018 By AMK

CAS Board clarifies commercial item exemption, but raises potential audit issue

After publishing a proposed rule more than five and a half years ago, the Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) Board on July 17, 2018 issued a final rule revising the CAS exemption for contracts or subcontracts for the acquisition of commercial items.

The final rule clarifies that the current CAS exemption for commercial items extends to all contract types listed in Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 12.207. However, in doing so, it also creates a potential audit issue arising out of the conditions levied by FAR 12.207 on certain contract types.

FAR lists contract types the government may use to acquire commercial items, including firm-fixed-price (FFP) contracts in conjunction with award fee incentives or performance/delivery incentives, known as fixed-price incentive (FPI) contracts. The relevant CAS commercial item exemption states that certain types of contracts for the acquisition of commercial items are exempt from all CAS. CAS 9903.201-1(b)(6) lists various contract types, including FFP, fixed-priced with economic price adjustment, time-and-materials (T&M) and labor-hour (LH), but makes no mention of FPI contracts. This inconsistency is the result of various amendments over time by the FAR Council to FAR 12.207. The final rule amends the language in CAS 9903.201-1(b)(6) to exempt commercial item contracts and subcontracts authorized in FAR 12.207 from all CAS requirements. Look for this change to CAS 9903.201-1(b)(6) when the final rule becomes effective on August 16, 2018.

Keep reading this article at: http://www.mondaq.com/article.asp?articleid=726522

Filed Under: Government Contracting News Tagged With: CAS, CASB, commercial item, cost accounting, Cost Accounting Standard, Cost Accounting Standards Board, economic price adjustment, FAR, firm fixed price, fixed price, fixed price incentive, GAO, OFPP

December 15, 2014 By AMK

Acquisition reform? Who says?

There is a lot of talk about the next generation of reforms and changes to the regimes of government acquisition policies, practices and culture.

But two stark examples emerged almost simultaneously in recent weeks that highlight just how far we have to go to create a federal acquisition system that is effective, efficient, responsive to the needs of customers, and enables access to the full array of capabilities the private sector can offer.

One example speaks directly to continued cultural challenges and the other to the mindset that drives far too much current policy and practice.

Let’s start with the culture. In a Nov. 7 article in Government Executive magazine, Kimberly McCabe, the CEO of ASI Government and Dan Chenok, the head of the IBM Center for the Business of Government, made a strong, thoughtful, and articulate case for thinking about acquisition in a holistic manner with an eye toward the realities of today and a very different future.

Moreover, their article outlined a new framework designed to describe and help measure organizational acquisition capabilities and maturity. And, perhaps most significantly, recognizing that the pressure for real, sustainable change has to come from within, the framework they outlined was largely the work of a group of federal acquisition and technology practitioners—from rising professionals to senior executives—they had convened.

Keep reading this article at: http://washingtontechnology.com/articles/2014/12/05/insights-soloway-acquisition-reform.aspx

Filed Under: Government Contracting News Tagged With: acquisition reform, acquisition training, acquisition workforce, contractor performance, DAU, DoD, fair and reasonable price, fixed price incentive, myth-busting, OFPP, procurement reform, weighted profit guidelines

Popular Topics

abuse acquisition reform acquisition strategy acquisition training acquisition workforce Air Force Army AT&L bid protest budget budget cuts competition cybersecurity DAU DFARS DHS DoD DOJ FAR fraud GAO Georgia Tech GSA GSA Schedule GSA Schedules IG industrial base information technology innovation IT Justice Dept. Navy NDAA OFPP OMB OTA Pentagon procurement reform protest SBA sequestration small business spending technology VA
Contracting Academy Logo
75 Fifth Street, NW, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30308
info@ContractingAcademy.gatech.edu
Phone: 404-894-6109
Fax: 404-410-6885

RSS Twitter

Search this Website

Copyright © 2023 · Georgia Tech - Enterprise Innovation Institute