foreign manufacturer | The Contracting Education Academy

Reliance on foreign suppliers in the defense industrial base rose — notably in packaged software and IT services — even as calls for reshoring increase, according to a new report.

Reshoring the defense supply chain may reduce national security risks, but a new report detailing a heavy dependency on goods and services from foreign countries like China shows reshoring may be easier said than done.

Researchers at Govini, a decision science company supporting the defense industry, analyzed data from over 1,000 Defense Department vendors across 100 industries to show how supply chain reliance on products from foreign countries has increased over the past decade. According to the survey, the number of Chinese suppliers in DOD’s base increased by a total of 420% since 2010.

For cyber and information technology, two statistics stick out. The share of companies based in foreign nations in the supply chain grew the most in the packaged software and IT services between 2010 and 2019. Companies based in foreign countries made up 3% of the packaged software supplier base in 2010. That number rose to 7% in 2019. The numbers are similar for IT services: Companies based in foreign countries made up 3% of the IT services supplier base in 2010 and 7% in 2019.

Keep reading this article at: https://www.defenseone.com/threats/2020/08/number-foreign-companies-within-defense-supply-chain-grew-over-past-decade-report-says/167767/

Some companies doing business with the Defense Department have opaque ownership structures that may conceal who owns, controls, or benefits from the company.

This GAO illustration depicts how DoD’s use of an ineligible foreign manufacturer — that illegally exported sensitive military data and provided defective and nonconforming parts — led to the grounding of at least 47 U.S. fighter aircraft.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently identified fraud and national security risks to DoD from opaque ownership such as ineligible contractors receiving contracts and foreign firms receiving sensitive information through U.S.-based companies.

These risks, identified through GAO’s review of 32 adjudicated cases, include price inflation through multiple companies owned by the same entity to falsely create the appearance of competition, contractors receiving contracts they were not eligible to receive, and a foreign manufacturer receiving sensitive information or producing faulty equipment through a U.S.-based company.

For example, one case involved an ineligible foreign manufacturer that illegally exported sensitive military data and provided defective and nonconforming parts that led to the grounding of at least 47 fighter aircraft.

The GAO reports that DoD has taken some steps that could address some of the risks related to contractor ownership in the procurement process but has not yet assessed these risks across the department. DoD, in coordination with other agencies, revised the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) in 2014 to require contractors to self-report some ownership information. In addition, DoD has taken steps to identify and use ownership information — for example, as part of its supply-chain risk analysis when acquiring critical components. DoD has also begun a department-wide fraud risk management program but, according to GAO, it has neither assessed risks of contractor ownership across the department nor identified risks posed by contractor ownership as a specific area for assessment.

GAO contends that assessing risks arising from contractor ownership would allow DoD to take a strategic approach to identifying and managing these risks, make informed decisions on how to best use its resources, and evaluate its existing control activities to ensure they effectively respond to these risks.

Keep reading this GAO report summary at: https://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-20-106#summary

Number of foreign companies within Defense supply chain grew over past decade

Reliance on foreign suppliers in the defense industrial base rose — notably in packaged software and IT services — even as calls for reshoring increase, according to a new report.

GAO says DoD’s fraud assessment efforts should include examination of contractor ownership

Some companies doing business with the Defense Department have opaque ownership structures that may conceal who owns, controls, or benefits from the company.

Search this Website