The Contracting Education Academy

Contracting Academy Logo
  • Home
  • Training & Education
  • Services
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for subcontracting plan

July 6, 2020 By cs

GAO: Oversight of contractor compliance with subcontracting plans needs improvement

Half of the contracts recently examined by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) didn’t contain evidence of compliance with small business subcontracting requirements.
The subcontracting report submission system is web-based.  Photo credit: GAO file photo

Federal agencies are supposed to notify Small Business Administration (SBA) representatives about proposed contracts that contain small business subcontracting plans for possible review.  But for about half of the 26 contracts we examined, agencies couldn’t show whether that happened.

Agencies also didn’t ensure that contractors submitted subcontracting reports, or that the reports were accurate.

Certain federal contracts that go to large businesses must have small business subcontracting plans.  Under these plans, contractors have to make a good-faith effort to offer subcontracting opportunities to small businesses.

GAO Report Details

GAO, in its report publicly released on June 29, 2020, found that selected agencies did not consistently follow all required procedures for oversight of small business subcontracting plans, both before and after contracts were awarded.  GAO reviewed 26 contracts with a subcontracting plan at four agencies — Defense Logistics Agency (DLA), General Services Administration (GSA), National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), and the Department of the Navy (Navy).

For about half of the 26 contracts, agencies could not demonstrate that procedures for Procurement Center Representative (PCR) reviews were followed. These SBA representatives may review small business subcontracting plans and provide recommendations for improving small business participation.  When an agency is awarding a contract that includes a subcontracting plan, contracting officers are required to notify these representatives of the opportunity to review the proposed contract.  Without taking steps to ensure these opportunities are provided, agencies may not receive and benefit from suggestions for increasing small business participation.

For 14 of the 26 contracts, contracting officers did not ensure contractors submitted required subcontracting reports.  After a contract is awarded, contracting officers must review reports contractors submit that describe their progress towards meeting approved small business subcontracting goals.  In some cases, contracting officers accepted reports with subcontracting goals different from those in the approved subcontracting plans, with no documentation explaining the difference.  Without complete and accurate information about a contractor’s subcontracting goals, an agency cannot adequately assess a contractor’s performance in meeting its subcontracting plan responsibilities.

The SBA encourages agency compliance with small business subcontracting plan requirements by providing training to contracting officers and contractors, and by conducting reviews.  For instance, SBA Commercial Market Representatives conduct compliance reviews to evaluate a large prime contractor’s compliance with subcontracting program procedures and goal achievement. However, SBA could not provide documentation or information on almost all compliance reviews conducted in fiscal years 2016–2018.  SBA has developed new procedures for conducting compliance reviews, but as of mid-March 2020, had yet to fully implement them.  SBA has conducted fiscal year 2019 compliance reviews that reflect a first phase of their new procedures.  SBA has draft guidance on the new compliance review process, including some specific information regarding what Commercial Market Representatives are to record as part of the compliance review. SBA has begun to conduct compliance reviews in accordance with the guidance, but does not have clearly documented and maintained records for the first phase of these reviews.  Without consistent, clear documentation and records that will be maintained going forward, SBA’s ability to track contractor compliance and agency oversight efforts will be limited.

Why GAO Did the Review

Certain federal contracts must have a small business subcontracting plan if subcontracting opportunities exist.  But recent Department of Defense Inspector General reports raised concerns about agency oversight of subcontracting requirements.  GAO was asked to review oversight of subcontracting plans.  Among its objectives, GAO’s report discusses: 1) the extent to which selected agencies (DLA, GSA, NASA, and Navy) oversee small business subcontracting plans, and 2) how SBA encourages agency compliance with subcontracting plan requirements.

GAO reviewed data and documentation for a non-generalizable sample of 32 federal contracts (including 26 contracts with a subcontracting plan) at four agencies, selected to include contracts over $1.5 million at both civilian and military agencies awarded in fiscal years 2016–2018.  GAO also reviewed the Federal Acquisition Regulation, SBA and selected agency documentation, and interviewed agency officials.

What GAO Recommends

GAO made 10 recommendations to strengthen oversight of these plans.  GAO’s recommendations address ensuring that procedures for PCR reviews are followed, contractor subcontracting reports are monitored and reviewed for accuracy, and SBA compliance reviews are clearly documented and maintained.  DLA, GSA, NASA, and Navy concurred with all of GAO’s recommendations. SBA partially concurred with the recommendation pertaining to that agency’s operation, although GAO maintains that its recommendation is warranted.

View GAO’s full report at: https://www.gao.gov/assets/710/707231.pdf.

Filed Under: Government Contracting News Tagged With: acquisition workforce, CMR, Commercial Market Representatives, contracting officers, contracting opportunities, DLA, DoD, Electronic Subcontracting Reporting System, eSRS, GAO, good faith, GSA, NASA, Navy, PCR, Procurement Center Representative, SBA, subcontracting, subcontracting goals, subcontracting plan

October 1, 2015 By AMK

Reminder: Selected federal acquisition thresholds change today

As we first informed you on July 8, some of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) dollar thresholds change effective October 1, 2015.

The inflationary adjustments to the thresholds are summarized below, inluding references to the applicable FAR parts:

  • FARThe micro-purchase threshold of $3,000 increases to $3,500 (FAR 2.101).
  • The threshold for use of simplified acquisition procedures for acquisition of commercial items increases from $6.5 million to $7 million (FAR 13.500).
  • The cost or pricing data threshold (FAR 15.403-4) and the  Cost Accounting Standards threshold (FAR 30.201-4 and FAR clause 52.230-5) increases from $700,000 to $750,000.
  • The prime contractor subcontracting plan floor increases from $650,000 to $700,000.  The subcontracting plan threshold for construction contracts remains the same at $1.5 million (FAR 19.702).
  • The threshold for reporting first-tier subcontract information, including executive compensation, increases from $25,000 to $30,000 (FAR Subpart 4.14 and FAR clause 52.204-10).
  • The threshold for including the clause requiring contractors to provide equal employment opportunities to veterans increases from $100,000 to $150,000 (FAR 22.1303 and FAR clause 52.222-35).
  • The threshold requiring contractors to flowdown the clause regarding a contractor’s Code of Business Ethics and Conduct increases from $5 million to $5.5 million (FAR clause 52.203-15).
  • The threshold restricting subcontracts with a contractor that has been debarred, suspended, or proposed for debarment increases from $30,000 to $35,000 (FAR 9.409 and FAR clause 52.209-6).

Other FAR-prescribed dollar thresholds do not change at this time.  For instance, the simplified acquisition threshold of $150,000 (FAR 2.101) remains unchanged, and FedBizOpps preaward and postaward notices (FAR Parts 5.101 and 5.301) remain at $25,000..

Filed Under: Government Contracting News Tagged With: Cost Accounting Standard, executive compensation, FAR, FedBizOpps, Federal Acquisition Regulation, Federal Register, federal regulations, inflation, micro purchase, SAT, simplified acquisition, subcontracting plan, threshold

July 8, 2015 By AMK

Federal acquisition thresholds to change Oct. 1st

Changes will occur in various federal acquisition dollar thresholds effective Oct. 1, 2015. 

Federal Register

An acquisition-related dollar threshold is a dollar threshold that is specified in law as a factor in defining the scope of the applicability of a policy, procedure, requirement, or restriction provided in that law to the procurement of supplies or services by an executive agency, as determined by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Council.

As set forth in Federal Register – Vol. 80 No. 127 – July 2, 2015 (pages 38293 through 38296), the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) will be amended to change:

  • The micro-purchase base threshold from $3,000 (FAR 2.101) to $3,500.
  • The threshold for use of simplified acquisition procedures for acquisition of commercial items (FAR 13.500) from $6.5 million to $7 million.
  • The cost or pricing data threshold (FAR 15.403-4) and the statutorily equivalent Cost Accounting Standard threshold from $700,000 to $750,000.
  • The prime contractor subcontracting plan (FAR 19.702) floor from $650,000 to $700,000  (The construction threshold of $1,500,000 will remain unchanged.)
  • The threshold for reporting first-tier subcontract information including executive compensation from $25,000 to $30,000 (FAR subpart 4.14 and section 52.204-10).

Other FAR-prescribed thresholds will not change.  The simplified acquisition threshold (FAR 2.101) of $150,000 will remain unchanged, and FedBizOpps pre-award and post-award notices (FAR part 5) will remain at $25,000 because of trade agreements.

If an acquisition-related threshold is based on statute, the matrix at http:// www.regulations.gov (search FAR case 2008–024) identifies the statute, and the statutory threshold. If inflation adjustment is warranted, calculations are rounded in accordance with the table shown above.
If an acquisition-related threshold is
based on statute, the matrix at http://
www.regulations.gov (search FAR case
2008–024) identifies the statute, and the
statutory threshold. Inflation calculations are rounded in accordance with the table shown above.

Filed Under: Government Contracting News Tagged With: Cost Accounting Standard, executive compensation, FAR, FedBizOpps, Federal Acquisition Regulation, Federal Register, federal regulations, micro purchase, SAT, simplified acquisition, subcontracting plan, threshold

Popular Topics

abuse acquisition reform acquisition strategy acquisition training acquisition workforce Air Force Army AT&L bid protest budget budget cuts competition cybersecurity DAU DFARS DHS DoD DOJ FAR fraud GAO Georgia Tech GSA GSA Schedule GSA Schedules IG industrial base information technology innovation IT Justice Dept. Navy NDAA OFPP OMB OTA Pentagon procurement reform protest SBA sequestration small business spending technology VA
Contracting Academy Logo
75 Fifth Street, NW, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30308
info@ContractingAcademy.gatech.edu
Phone: 404-894-6109
Fax: 404-410-6885

RSS Twitter

Search this Website

Copyright © 2023 · Georgia Tech - Enterprise Innovation Institute