The Contracting Education Academy

Contracting Academy Logo
  • Home
  • Training & Education
  • Services
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Archives for supply chain management

July 15, 2020 By cs

Second supply chain risk management rule drops putting agencies, vendors on notice

Starting Aug. 13, agencies will no longer be able to contract with companies using Chinese-made telecommunications products or services in their supply chains.

A new rule from the Federal Acquisition Regulatory Council prohibits agencies from buying products or services from companies which use Huawei, ZTE, or other prohibited products from Chinese companies. The prohibition applies to the use of telecommunications equipment or services, whether or not it is used in the performance of work under a federal contract.

The one exception is if the agency’s secretary issues a waiver for the contract.

“The statute is not limited to contracting with entities that use end-products produced by those companies; it also covers the use of any equipment, system or service that uses covered telecommunications equipment or services as a substantial or essential component of any system, or as critical technology as part of any system,” the council stated.

Keep reading this article at: https://federalnewsnetwork.com/acquisition-policy/2020/07/second-supply-chain-risk-management-rule-drops-putting-agencies-vendors-on-notice/

Filed Under: Government Contracting News Tagged With: acquisition workforce, China, Chinese firms, communication technology, FAR, FAR Council, parts and components, supply chain, supply chain management, telecommunications

May 14, 2020 By cs

Why restarting the global economy won’t be easy

As the world contemplates ending a massive lockdown implemented in response to COVID-19, Vinod Singhal is considering what will happen when we hit the play button and the engines that drive industry and trade squeal back to life again. 
The U.S. gets close to a trillion dollars of products annually from Asian countries, and most are shipped by sea, which requires a four-to-six-week lead time. Here, containers are stacked at a Georgia Ports Authority facility in Savannah. (GPA Photo: Stephen B. Morton)

Singhal, who studies operations strategy and supply chain management at the Georgia Institute of Technology, has a few ideas on how to ease the transition to the new reality. But this pandemic makes it hard to predict what that reality will be.

“We know pandemics can disrupt supply chains, because we’ve had the SARS experience, but this is something very different,” said Singhal, the Charles W. Brady Chair Professor of Operations Management at the Scheller College of Business, recalling the SARS viral pandemic of 2002 to 2003. But that event did not have nearly the deadly, worldwide reach of COVID-19.

“There is really nothing to compare this pandemic to,” he said. “And predicting or estimating stock prices is simply impossible, unlike supply chain disruptions caused by a company’s own fault, or a natural disaster, like the earthquake in Japan.”

The earthquake that shook northeastern Japan in March 2011 unleashed a devastating and deadly tsunami that caused a meltdown at a nuclear power plant, and also rocked the world economy. It was called the most significant disruption ever of global supply chains. Singhal co-authored a study on the aftereffects, “Stock Market Reaction to Supply Chain Disruptions from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake,” published online in August 2019 in the journal Manufacturing & Service Operations Management.

But COVID-19 represents a new kind of mystery when it comes to something as complex and critical to the world’s economy as the global supply chain, for a number of reasons that Singhal highlighted:

  • The global spread of the virus and duration of the pandemic. “We have no idea when it will be under control and whether it will resurface,” Singhal said. “With a natural disaster you can kind of predict that if we put in some effort, within a few months we can get back to normal. But here there is a lot of uncertainty.”
  • Both the demand and supply side of the global supply chain are disrupted. “We’re not only seeing a lot of factories shutting down, which affects the supply side, but there are restrictions on demand, too, because you can’t just go out and shop like you used to, at least for the time being,” he said. “And all this is taking place in an environment where supply chains are fairly complex – intricate, interconnected, interdependent, and global.”
  • Longer lead times. “We get close to a trillion dollars of products annually from Asian countries, about $500 billion from China,” Singhal said. “Most are shipped by sea which requires a four-to-six-week lead time. The fact that logistics and distribution has been disrupted and needs to ramp up again will increase lead time. So, it will take time to fill up the pipeline, and that is going to be an issue.”
  • Supply chains have little slack, and little spare inventory. While manufacturing giants such as Apple, Boeing, and General Motors have more financial slack to carry them through a massive economic belt tightening, their suppliers, spread out across the globe, come in different sizes, different tiers, “and these smaller companies don’t have much financial slack,” said Singhal, pointing to a report of small and medium sized companies in China, “which have less than three months of cash. They’ve already been shut down for two months, and cash tends to go away quickly.

“Many of these companies may go bankrupt,” he added. “So we need to figure out how to reduce the number of bankruptcies. Government is going to play an important role in this, and the stimulus package the U.S. has approved will be helpful.”

Trying to get a handle on how stock markets are responding to all that has happened is like trying to take aim at a moving target during a stiff wind. Volatility has increased significantly since February 13, when the Dow Jones index reached an all-time high of about 29,500.

“That’s because we did not expect the pandemic to spread and disruptions initially were low because of pipeline inventory,” Singhal said, noting that since then the Index dropped sharply, to 18,500 on March 23 (a decline of nearly 38 percent), it picked up and was back to 22,000 by March 30. “The same is true of other stock markets. The Chinese stock market was down 13 percent, but they seem to have the pandemic under control.”

While COVID-19 is making it difficult to predict what the market will look like, Singhal has some ideas of which industries will be most affected.

“Travel, tourism, entertainment, restaurants – businesses that rely on people going out—will take a long time to recover, in terms of profitability and stock price, even once the pandemic is contained,” he said. “People are going to be hesitant to travel after all this. Tourism will take a hit.”

Essentials like groceries are surging as people stock up in reaction to being shut in, but this isn’t a long-term trend. Singhal doesn’t expect this trend to continue as shopping habits and store shelves eventually normalize.

Companies that sell basics, with a strong online presence, will do well, “but industries like automobiles and electronics, which have global supply chains and have a hard time replacing specialized, high-tech components will be affected,” said Singhal, who also has suggestions on the most important issues to address and how to help speed up the recovery and bring supply chains back to normal (or whatever normal looks like after this):

  • The ability to bring capacity online, especially for small and medium-sized companies. “Facilities and equipment may need some time to restart,” he said. “Staffing is a big issue. How quickly can you get people back to work? Also, can you get the raw materials and build up the inventory to support production? That may be tough when pent up demand is being released and everybody is competing for limited supplies.”
  • Distribution. Lead times already are long, he notes, and a sudden increase in demand for logistics and distribution services as everybody ramps up again could extend lead times.
  • Prevent bankruptcies. Government programs need to be established (like the U.S. stimulus package) to keep small- and medium-sized firms in business. This concern extends to second- and third-tier suppliers, and large firms like Apple or Boeing or GM, should do the same for their most critical suppliers.
  • Build slack. “Preserve cash, get new lines of credit or draw down lines of credit, maybe cut dividends or stock repurchases,” Singhal said. “And build inventories of critical components.”

Singhal also stresses the need for transparency, up and down the supply chain: “What that means is, companies need to have a good understanding of what is happening to their customers and suppliers, but not just their immediate, first tier customers and suppliers, but also their customers and suppliers, and so on up and down the line.”

It will be very important going forward for the next several months to monitor the health of the supply chain from both the customer perspective and a supplier perspective, because this is a new world, says Singhal, who adds an optimistic postscript, “It’s a crisis situation now, but I think we can put it back together.”


Source: http://www.news.gatech.edu/2020/05/10/why-restarting-global-economy-wont-be-easy

For more coverage of Georgia Tech’s response to the coronavirus pandemic, please visit our Responding to COVID-19 page.

The Contracting Education Academy at Georgia Tech has established a webpage where all contract-related developments related to the coronavirus (COVID-19) are summarized.  Find the page at: https://contractingacademy.gatech.edu/coronavirus-information-for-contracting-officers-and-contractors/

Filed Under: Georgia Tech News Tagged With: coronavirus, COVID-19, delivery time, disruptive, economic recovery, Georgia Tech, lead time, operations, pandemic, small business, strategic sourcing, supply chain, supply chain management, Technology and Logistics

May 14, 2020 By cs

Defense contractor certification body says maintenance of companies’ cybersecurity posture is within its role

The accreditation body overseeing the Defense Department’s cybersecurity certification for prospective contractors is also authorized to provide certified companies with cybersecurity services, according to members of the group’s board of directors. 

“A continuous monitoring capability could provide benefits to organizations in the defense supply chain by increasing their awareness of changes to their current cybersecurity posture,” Mark Berman, chairman of the board’s communications committee told Nextgov. “This initiative is a potential avenue where we can provide value add to enhance and maintain the security posture.”

Berman was responding to comments from observers who say an April 22 request for proposal the accreditation board issued for a “continuous monitoring solution” marks a departure from the training and certification functions the group is expected to perform.

The Pentagon’s Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification program is scheduled to take effect this fall following a change to defense federal acquisition regulations. Companies will have to attain third-party certification of their cybersecurity practices if they want to do business with the department. Defense contractors currently state whether they adhere to standards such as those outlined by the National Institute of Standards and Technology without any outside entity verifying their claims.

Keep reading this article at: https://www.nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2020/05/defense-contractor-certification-body-says-maintenance-companies-cybersecurity-posture-within-its-role/165131/

Filed Under: Government Contracting News Tagged With: assessment, CMMC, CMMC AB, CMMC accreditation, cybersecurity, Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, DCMA, DoD, MDA, NIST, risk assessment, SP 800-171, supply chain, supply chain management, supply chain security

May 4, 2020 By cs

DoD sees CMMC as new way to monitor supply chain, spot shell companies

The Defense Department wants to implement its much-discussed Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification program mainly to ensure every single one of its vendors is undertaking minimum levels of commonly-understood cybersecurity practices so it can protect its supply chain.

But Defense officials increasingly see CMMC as a way to monitor aspects of that supply chain that aren’t strictly about cybersecurity.

DoD expects tens of thousands of its contractors to earn a CMMC certification over the next five years. But to get one — even at the most rudimentary Level One of CMMC — each company will need an in-person visit from a third-party assessor. Those visits are primarily so that auditors can verify companies have actually implemented the security practices required for their level of certification, since no self-attestations will be allowed.

But there’s another reason DoD also wants a set of human eyes on each CMMC applicant: the department wants to make sure each firm that’s certified is actually a real company with real employees.

Keep reading this article at: https://federalnewsnetwork.com/defense-main/2020/04/dod-sees-cmmc-as-new-way-to-monitor-supply-chain-spot-shell-companies/

Filed Under: Government Contracting News Tagged With: assessment, CMMC, CMMC AB, CMMC accreditation, cybersecurity, Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, DCMA, DoD, MDA, NIST, risk assessment, SP 800-171, supply chain, supply chain management, supply chain security

April 28, 2020 By cs

Pentagon’s cybersecurity certification plan includes continuously monitoring contractors

The accreditation body overseeing the Defense Department’s Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification program — the CMMC-AB — issued a request for proposal that provides insight into how the group plans to keep track of contractors outside of conducting physical audits.

The CMMC will end the DoD’s practice of allowing contractors to “self-certify” their cybersecurity practices. Before the end of the year, the department intends to require companies doing business with the DoD to gain a certificate from third-party auditors that will be valid for up to three years.

“As part of the CMMC-AB’s efforts to mitigate risks posed to the country through sharing of sensitive information with DoD supply chain partners, a continuous monitoring solution will help fill in the gaps between assessments scheduled for once every three years,” the RFP reads. “The CMMC-AB is issuing this request for proposal to help us identify appropriate partners in our continuous monitoring solution.”

The CMMC-AB posted the RFP to its LinkedIn page with a May 1 deadline for responses.

Keep reading this article at: https://www.nextgov.com/cybersecurity/2020/04/pentagons-cybersecurity-certification-plan-includes-continuously-monitoring-contractors/164821/

Filed Under: Government Contracting News Tagged With: assessment, CMMC, CMMC AB, CMMC accreditation, cybersecurity, Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification, DCMA, DoD, MDA, NIST, risk assessment, SP 800-171, supply chain, supply chain management, supply chain security

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Next Page »

Popular Topics

abuse acquisition reform acquisition strategy acquisition training acquisition workforce Air Force Army AT&L bid protest budget budget cuts competition cybersecurity DAU DFARS DHS DoD DOJ FAR fraud GAO Georgia Tech GSA GSA Schedule GSA Schedules IG industrial base information technology innovation IT Justice Dept. Navy NDAA OFPP OMB OTA Pentagon procurement reform protest SBA sequestration small business spending technology VA
Contracting Academy Logo
75 Fifth Street, NW, Suite 300
Atlanta, GA 30308
info@ContractingAcademy.gatech.edu
Phone: 404-894-6109
Fax: 404-410-6885

RSS Twitter

Search this Website

Copyright © 2023 · Georgia Tech - Enterprise Innovation Institute